Jagtonix
I will rock your faaace!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Jagtonix on Sept 24, 2008 20:52:15 GMT 1
Interesting view of the future. Not so sure about his "we wanted a game that got better with time" stuff though. How does the exact same game become fundamentally better with improved graphics? It's still the same game... Here
|
|
|
Post by Target on Sept 24, 2008 23:59:00 GMT 1
How does the exact same game become fundamentally better with improved graphics? It's still the same game..[/quote]
See that's the thing with game developers these days. The think that all we gamers want is nice graphics, if it looks nice no one care about the game play.
It's 50/50 with game play and graphics for me.
|
|
spO_on
pwning you since 1975
Posts: 1,220
|
Post by spO_on on Sept 25, 2008 20:23:25 GMT 1
yeh me 2 MinD, if the gameplay is crap then it doesnt matter how fat my eyes get from all the candy.
|
|
Jagtonix
I will rock your faaace!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Jagtonix on Sept 26, 2008 19:44:08 GMT 1
I agree that some games require graphics to make the overall game better, but it's an incredibly fine line. For example, as a game (in whole), I don't think Bioshock would have been as good without the incredible graphics. If it looked like quake 2 but had the same gameplay, I don't think it would compare. But once you hit a certain point, improving graphics has no real effect besides the esthetic, which has very litlle impact on gameplay.
|
|
|
Post by zl on Mar 16, 2010 10:10:46 GMT 1
|
|